sakura’s Nono is a Yesyes!

[Kingcobra]

Wow, I just shared my personal opinion. My review was very vague, and I'm not going to explain what I heard. If you like seeing these ladies, feel free to continue seeing them. It didn’t work for me, but that doesn't mean it wouldn’t work for you.

I purposely messed up the timeline to stay anonymous. I don’t understand why people are getting impressed by the detailed investigation done by Sakura

If you're doing everything right, you shouldn't get triggered by this review. You have plenty of fans here, and I even liked seeing the ladies working with you. I’ve seen most of the ladies at Sakura and had a very positive impression of them.

I just don’t like visiting sakura anymore. Simple as that.

[Sakura Dreams]

Originally Posted by Gerald

Most likely due to him saying he booked her after reading the review posted at 9:52pm the 15th, then posted his own review at 3:29pm of the 16th.
That means he seen her either very late on the 15th or early on the 16th.
Saying he thought she was tired would make sense if it was a late night encounter. Toady can be very exhausting. lol
Not every provider can impress every client, unfortunately. She just has to impress the majority.

exactly. Just to clarify one important point — a late-night visit on the 15th wouldn’t have been possible. Nono’s final appointment on June 15 was at 7:00pm, and she did not take any further bookings that night. So if the reviewer claims he saw her after reading the review posted at 9:52pm on the 15th, the only realistic window would be sometime on the 16th, likely between 11:00am and 3:00pm based on the timestamp of his own post.

[Sakura Dreams]

Originally Posted by Donny78

Sakura's response is ridiculous and comes across as unprofessional.

Instead of inventing some wild speculations, why can't they just accept that not every single client is gonna click with every single service provider.

Just to clarify one important point — the reason we felt the need to respond wasn’t because someone said they didn’t “click” with a provider. That’s completely fair and happens in this industry all the time. In fact, as we clearly stated at the beginning of our original post:

“We understand that not every session will be perfect, and when something goes wrong, we take full responsibility and do what we can to make it right.”

What we took issue with — and why we felt a response was necessary — is that the reviewer didn’t stop at expressing a mismatch in chemistry. He went further and wrote that the model “casually told him some weird things” about Sakura and other Asian agencies she worked with, and then concluded that he would never see any Asian agencies again.

We feel that making a statement like that — without specifying what "weird things" were supposedly said — is a wild speculation and the beginning of an irresponsible conspiracy narrative aimed at discrediting us. It leaves readers with vague suspicion and invites damaging assumptions without any proof.

If Kingcobra believes something inappropriate was said or done, we respectfully ask him to elaborate publicly on what exactly those "weird things" were. We’re fully confident that we operate fairly and ethically — we have nothing to hide.

In fact, our treatment of our staff is something we’re proud of. Many models — including those who’ve worked across Canada — have told us we’re the best and easiest agency they’ve ever worked with. Without that, it wouldn’t be possible for high-quality models to consistently visit a smaller market like London.

We welcome real feedback. But vague innuendo that casts doubt without explanation isn’t constructive — it’s damaging and unfair to the people who work hard every day to maintain high standards.

[Sakura Dreams]

Originally Posted by Kingcobra

Wow, I just shared my personal opinion. My review was very vague, and I'm not going to explain what I heard. If you like seeing these ladies, feel free to continue seeing them. It didn’t work for me, but that doesn't mean it wouldn’t work for you.

I purposely messed up the timeline to stay anonymous. I don’t understand why people are getting impressed by the detailed investigation done by Sakura

If you're doing everything right, you shouldn't get triggered by this review. You have plenty of fans here, and I even liked seeing the ladies working with you. I’ve seen most of the ladies at Sakura and had a very positive impression of them.

I just don’t like visiting sakura anymore. Simple as that.

Thanks for taking the time to clarify your intentions — and also for acknowledging that you altered the timeline to remain anonymous.

We do appreciate the honesty. However, that also confirms that at least part of the review was knowingly fabricated, which naturally raises questions for any reader trying to take it at face value.

That said, the anonymity explanation doesn’t fully hold up in this case. By referencing a review posted at 9:52 p.m. on June 15, you unintentionally narrowed the possible timeframe to a very specific window — roughly 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. on June 16. Ironically, that made it easier, not harder, for us to identify when the visit may have occurred, which ultimately undercut the very anonymity you were trying to maintain. If you had simply left the date out entirely, we wouldn’t have known which day you came — and it would have remained truly anonymous.

Also, leaving that inaccurate reference uncorrected would have had consequences beyond your own post — it would have unfairly cast doubt on Toady’s review, since you claimed it was the reason you booked. If your visit didn’t actually follow his, it could make it seem like he fabricated his review too, which is unfair to him.

We’re not “triggered” because someone didn’t click with a model — that’s normal in this line of work. What concerned us was the vague mention of “weird things” supposedly said about Sakura and other Asian agencies, without offering any clarity or context. That kind of ambiguity opens the door to speculation and unfair doubt.

If there is something specific that was said or experienced that you feel is important, we truly welcome you to share it in public. We’re confident in our standards, and many models have expressed that we are one of the fairest, safest, and easiest agencies to work with. That’s how we’ve been able to consistently attract quality talent even in a smaller market like London.

If you’ve simply moved on from Sakura, we respect that. But when something serious is implied — even vaguely — we feel a responsibility to address it directly, and transparently.

All that said, we do genuinely appreciate your business and support over time. None of this is intended to offend you in any way — we simply wanted to clearly explain our position, as our agency’s reputation matters not only to us, but also to the models who work with us and the clients who rely on accurate information.

[Shady]

Originally Posted by Donny78

Sakura's response is ridiculous and comes across as unprofessional.

Instead of inventing some wild speculations, why can't they just accept that not every single client is gonna click with every single service provider.

I didn’t find it to be unprofessional at all.

[biscuits&gravy]

No one will care and I'm at least a partial douche for saying this but why would anyone be willing to read the collective grouping of all of these posts/replies/messages. Maybe they're informative and insightful but meh.

[Sakura Dreams]

Originally Posted by biscuits&gravy

No one will care and I'm at least a partial douche for saying this but why would anyone be willing to read the collective grouping of all of these posts/replies/messages. Maybe they're informative and insightful but meh.

Haha fair enough. Sorry for being so long-winded 😅
We just take our reputation seriously, so sometimes we feel the need to explain things clearly when stuff gets murky. Appreciate the patience either way!

[Gerald]

Originally Posted by biscuits&gravy

No one will care and I'm at least a partial douche for saying this but why would anyone be willing to read the collective grouping of all of these posts/replies/messages. Maybe they're informative and insightful but meh.

So you just basically made us read a post in a thread about not wanting to read what's posted in the thread? lol

[pencilneckgeek]

Originally Posted by Gerald

So you just basically made us read a post in a thread about not wanting to read what's posted in the thread? lol

I scrolled through all the TLDR, read yours, told me enough.

[Zipperface]

As a potential Sakura client I would much rather read more details about the services and providers. That’s the kind of stuff that’s going to make me forget about who said what about who. For example, are outfits an option? And presto, just like that I’m finding it difficult to recollect…