Review of the reviewed....

[Tipper]

To some degree I understand what the OP is saying. There are times when descriptions are less than objective-instead of stating that an SP "has small breasts and that's what I like" the reviewer may state that the SP has incredible breasts. Could be somewhat misleading to someone who likes large breasts. everybody has preferences and one person's 10 may be someone else's 5. I think there are times when the reviews are incredibly misleading, and while I agree with Gerald that clients try to leverage the prospect of a good review, there are also ladies from this board and other places who try to leverage service for good reviews.
We haven't had a meet and greet in a few years, and they were useful for networking because then you could see what many of the ladies look like in person without an initial commitment.
Unfortunately you expressed what seem like honest opinions and got criticized by some, called a coward, and as often happens, you probably feel that your comments were not welcomed, while at the same time being told you should have posted your honest opinions and reviews in the past. The "welcome to London Sugar and please participate and don't be afraid to post your opinions but make sure you don't say anything we don't like" is one of the charming things about this board.

Tipper

[750gsxr]

Originally Posted by Tipper

To some degree I understand what the OP is saying. There are times when descriptions are less than objective-instead of stating that an SP "has small breasts and that's what I like" the reviewer may state that the SP has incredible breasts. Could be somewhat misleading to someone who likes large breasts. everybody has preferences and one person's 10 may be someone else's 5. I think there are times when the reviews are incredibly misleading, and while I agree with Gerald that clients try to leverage the prospect of a good review, there are also ladies from this board and other places who try to leverage service for good reviews.
We haven't had a meet and greet in a few years, and they were useful for networking because then you could see what many of the ladies look like in person without an initial commitment.
Unfortunately you expressed what seem like honest opinions and got criticized by some, called a coward, and as often happens, you probably feel that your comments were not welcomed, while at the same time being told you should have posted your honest opinions and reviews in the past. The "welcome to London Sugar and please participate and don't be afraid to post your opinions but make sure you don't say anything we don't like" is one of the charming things about this board.

Tipper

Thanks Tipper, I didn't want to get flamed on here but I was frustrated. I agree we all have our own perspective of what we like. I reammber Viper use to start of every storey to me with "you wouldn't like her but"when we all use to meet up for beers. But I'm straight up referring to people false advertising cup size ect.

I didn't mean to start an uproar (directed at everyone bitchkng me out) I just work hard for my money and really bare throwing it down the drain. A little more accuracy would be great

[menno11]

Thanks for writing your post 750gxsr. I have wanted to write something similar but was to shy to. I try to read reviews to get some perspective on what I could expect when I visit with someone. I really dislike when ages or weights are not accurately listed. I have been to embarrassed to write that a companion did not look as good as the photos, or who's weight did not match what was posted as that just feels rude to me. I just don't make second visits. But maybe if these items were honestly posted or reviewed if not accurate, the reviews would be more valid.

[Gettingon]

We live in a time and place of such abundance that it is too easy to put on unwanted weight. When was the last you felt hungry?

In my mind there is no such thing as a BBW ..Big Beautiful Woman..and many SPs post photos of their younger, slimmer selves as that is how they WANT to look, knowing that their potential clients usually prefer shapely slender women (like they used to be). Older, fuller figured photos will not attract clients, and the inaccurate photos will bring in clients who will not turn around and walk away.

Inspite of all the politically correct Fat Shamming BS there is nothig healthy or attractive about fat people.

And yeah....I am 10 lbs over my ideal weight so call me an old guy with a small pot calling the kettle black.

[Braveheart]

Maybe instead of meaningless BS like "the coffee was served hot" and without badly insulting anyone we can use expressions like:
- looks better than her pics; looks like her pics; doesn't really resemble
her pics; pics are probably someone else...
- describes herself accurately; may not be describing herself accurately;
description is not accurate (elaborate a bit)...
- very pleasant company; pleasant company; not really pleasant company...
- very pretty; pretty; average looks; below average looks...
- nice facilities; adequate facilities; needs better facilities....
- impeccable hygiene; good hygiene; hygiene needs improvement...
- looks younger than her age; looks her age; may have subtracted more than
a few years from her age...
- may have subtracted more than 10 pounds......
- skills are outstanding; skills are good; skills are average; skills are below
expectations...
These are not my original ideas, of course, since I have seen many of these terms used in reviews and there are many more we can come up with.
As for being critical of those who don't post reviews - I will not generally post a review unless I can add something significant that other reviews of the SP have missed or maybe to add an opposing view. I would also generally be hesitant to post a really negative review unless the overall experience is really bad and the SP is clearly not fulfilling expectations. Maybe we all can work on being a little more honest regarding pointing out those things that fall short of expectations and this may also help SP's to improve. Everyone can benefit from constructive criticism. If ya have a crappy meal in a restaurant but you smile and tell the server it was great and then you never go back nobody wins. Anybody can have a bad day.

[Gerald]

Originally Posted by Braveheart

Maybe instead of meaningless BS like "the coffee was served hot" and without badly insulting anyone we can use expressions like:
- looks better than her pics; looks like her pics; doesn't really resemble
her pics; pics are probably someone else...
- describes herself accurately; may not be describing herself accurately;
description is not accurate (elaborate a bit)...
- very pleasant company; pleasant company; not really pleasant company...
- very pretty; pretty; average looks; below average looks...
- nice facilities; adequate facilities; needs better facilities....
- impeccable hygiene; good hygiene; hygiene needs improvement...
- looks younger than her age; looks her age; may have subtracted more than
a few years from her age...
- may have subtracted more than 10 pounds......
- skills are outstanding; skills are good; skills are average; skills are below
expectations...
These are not my original ideas, of course, since I have seen many of these terms used in reviews and there are many more we can come up with.
As for being critical of those who don't post reviews - I will not generally post a review unless I can add something significant that other reviews of the SP have missed or maybe to add an opposing view. I would also generally be hesitant to post a really negative review unless the overall experience is really bad and the SP is clearly not fulfilling expectations. Maybe we all can work on being a little more honest regarding pointing out those things that fall short of expectations and this may also help SP's to improve. Everyone can benefit from constructive criticism. If ya have a crappy meal in a restaurant but you smile and tell the server it was great and then you never go back nobody wins. Anybody can have a bad day.

Agree

[menno11]

Excellent. I agree too!

[boomboom]

Originally Posted by Braveheart

Maybe instead of meaningless BS like "the coffee was served hot" and without badly insulting anyone we can use expressions like:
- looks better than her pics; looks like her pics; doesn't really resemble
her pics; pics are probably someone else...
- describes herself accurately; may not be describing herself accurately;
description is not accurate (elaborate a bit)...
- very pleasant company; pleasant company; not really pleasant company...
- very pretty; pretty; average looks; below average looks...
- nice facilities; adequate facilities; needs better facilities....
- impeccable hygiene; good hygiene; hygiene needs improvement...
- looks younger than her age; looks her age; may have subtracted more than
a few years from her age...
- may have subtracted more than 10 pounds......
- skills are outstanding; skills are good; skills are average; skills are below
expectations...
These are not my original ideas, of course, since I have seen many of these terms used in reviews and there are many more we can come up with.
As for being critical of those who don't post reviews - I will not generally post a review unless I can add something significant that other reviews of the SP have missed or maybe to add an opposing view. I would also generally be hesitant to post a really negative review unless the overall experience is really bad and the SP is clearly not fulfilling expectations. Maybe we all can work on being a little more honest regarding pointing out those things that fall short of expectations and this may also help SP's to improve. Everyone can benefit from constructive criticism. If ya have a crappy meal in a restaurant but you smile and tell the server it was great and then you never go back nobody wins. Anybody can have a bad day.

well said

I saw a SP a few months back that I saw 3yrs ago. She was still using the same pics as then... pics need updating as she gained 25-30lbs. But we still had fun. Plus I don't look like I did 3yrs ago either damn age thing catching up on me

[Stantheman]

Well, I'm gonna wade into the topic. First, you'd expect advertisors to put their "best" pics up as it's intended to attract clients. Second, I have some current pics of me that are not that flattering and others where the light is just right, might even look downright handsome. So, you do have to look at some of the pics to see how the angle is taken and if it's strategically positioned to accent something or to hide something else.

There are indeed a few that have some dated pics, they are indeed the person being advertised but, have changed physically. But, in some of those cases, I would argue they are likely posted to let their regulars know they are available.

Lastly, I've found as age and experience is accumulated, what we view with our eyes as attractive, doesn't always translate to the best encounter.

I prefer petite athletic women that are gymnasts in the bed room. And some I've contact look exactly like the pics, if not better but, have the personality of a dead fish. I've also spent time with some others that may not posses the physical attributes I prefer but, more than make up for it in their sexuality and enthusiasm. Not that their pics were inaccurate but, they may have had a little extra weight or a few years older than stated.

This board does have some lovely ladies. More than a couple. Dylan and Anika are two off the top that have updated pics and consistently have positive feedback. And they also have positive attitudes.

Is it fair to expect all to have the same business model? We can expect it but, it's not likely.

There is only 1 that I can think of that has pics that are outdated and was a little more to her than expected. It was in my earlier days. And truth be told, she was a great time. I just found it somewhat misleading and put me off but, since then, I've found plenty of excellent providers the meet my needs in appearance and encounters.


It's a great topic and read some good and bad feedback.

Happy Hobbying.

[VIPER]

Originally Posted by Stantheman

This board does have some lovely ladies. More than a couple. Dylan and Anika are two off the top that have updated pics and consistently have positive feedback. And they also have positive attitudes.

Glad to see you giving props to Dylan and Anika ...bang on comments!
They both have excellent attitudes !!
Timely that you posted your comment on Dylan's birthday too !
I would also add Sadie to this category !