Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcobra
Wow, I just shared my personal opinion. My review was very vague, and I'm not going to explain what I heard. If you like seeing these ladies, feel free to continue seeing them. It didn’t work for me, but that doesn't mean it wouldn’t work for you.
I purposely messed up the timeline to stay anonymous. I don’t understand why people are getting impressed by the detailed investigation done by Sakura
If you're doing everything right, you shouldn't get triggered by this review. You have plenty of fans here, and I even liked seeing the ladies working with you. I’ve seen most of the ladies at Sakura and had a very positive impression of them.
I just don’t like visiting sakura anymore. Simple as that.
|
Thanks for taking the time to clarify your intentions — and also for acknowledging that you altered the timeline to remain anonymous.
We do appreciate the honesty. However, that also confirms that at least part of the review was knowingly fabricated, which naturally raises questions for any reader trying to take it at face value.
That said, the anonymity explanation doesn’t fully hold up in this case. By referencing a review posted at 9:52 p.m. on June 15, you unintentionally narrowed the possible timeframe to a very specific window — roughly 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. on June 16. Ironically, that made it easier, not harder, for us to identify when the visit may have occurred, which ultimately undercut the very anonymity you were trying to maintain. If you had simply left the date out entirely, we wouldn’t have known which day you came — and it would have remained truly anonymous.
Also, leaving that inaccurate reference uncorrected would have had consequences beyond your own post — it would have unfairly cast doubt on Toady’s review, since you claimed it was the reason you booked. If your visit didn’t actually follow his, it could make it seem like he fabricated his review too, which is unfair to him.
We’re not “triggered” because someone didn’t click with a model — that’s normal in this line of work. What concerned us was the vague mention of “weird things” supposedly said about Sakura and other Asian agencies, without offering any clarity or context. That kind of ambiguity opens the door to speculation and unfair doubt.
If there is something specific that was said or experienced that you feel is important, we truly welcome you to share it in public. We’re confident in our standards, and many models have expressed that we are one of the fairest, safest, and easiest agencies to work with. That’s how we’ve been able to consistently attract quality talent even in a smaller market like London.
If you’ve simply moved on from Sakura, we respect that. But when something serious is implied — even vaguely — we feel a responsibility to address it directly, and transparently.
All that said, we do genuinely appreciate your business and support over time. None of this is intended to offend you in any way — we simply wanted to clearly explain our position, as our agency’s reputation matters not only to us, but also to the models who work with us and the clients who rely on accurate information.