Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcobra
I saw this lady after reading this review. I dont know, we didnt click. I found everything below average. May be she was tired by seeing many clients.
Also during our conversation, she casually told me some weird things about sakura and other asian agencies she worked with in Canada. It doesnt matter for many, however I have decided not to see any asian agencies ever again.
But good for you that you were able to spend some quality time with her
|
Interesting… I almost mistook you for a previous customer who had a disagreement with us, but he has since clarified that he wasn’t the one who wrote this review.
We’ve always welcomed honest feedback — both positive and negative. We understand that not every session will be perfect, and when something goes wrong, we take full responsibility and do what we can to make it right. Many of our long-time clients know this firsthand.
However, when a review lacks details, and contains false or misleading information, we feel it’s important to clarify the facts.
You previously praised Yuni and publicly said that Sakura is “something you can always rely on.” Now suddenly, without any specific complaints, you claim that “everything” was below average?
And this is regarding Nono, who — by nearly any objective standard — is more attractive than Yuni and is a verified Japanese adult film actress, with her content directly linked on our website. That contradiction already raises questions.
To be honest, this makes us question whether your past reviews were ever sincere. Was the praise genuine, or were you laying the groundwork to discredit us later? We don’t know your motive — you don’t appear to be a competitor, and there has been no past conflict with our team. But the sudden turn in tone and the lack of facts is hard to ignore.
Let’s talk about the timeline.
You claimed to have visited Nono after seeing a review posted at 9:52pm on June 15. But Nono’s last appointment on June 15 ended at 7:00pm, and she did not work after that.
Let’s assume you meant June 16 instead. Based on your posting time, that would place your visit between 11:00am and 3:00pm. We reviewed all bookings during that window and followed up directly with each client. All reported a positive experience. One customer gave light feedback, and we offered a one-time discount, which was received with appreciation and respect. None of the experiences match what you’ve described.
Since your review contains a serious accusation, we’re also prepared to back up our response with verifiable evidence.
We invite you to bring this matter to the London Sugar moderator, who can act as a neutral third party. We will provide the moderator with Nono’s appointment records for June 16 between 11am to 3pm, including the last four digits of each client’s phone number to protect privacy.
You may submit your claimed booking time and the last four digits of your phone number to the moderator as well.
If your information does not match any of the records, it will objectively confirm that the review is fabricated — and in that case, we trust the moderator to assess the situation fairly and transparently.
We’re committed to professionalism, transparency, and fairness — both to our clients and to the models who trust us. We don’t shy away from real feedback, but we also won’t tolerate false narratives intended to mislead others.
We’ll continue focusing on what we do best — delivering a respectful and high-quality experience to those who genuinely value it.