Re: Samantha the Fox
I actually didn't mean a long-term relationship. I didn't mean years upon years or dozens upon dozens of sessions. I didn't mean for it to sound or come off that way.
I also don't think one visit with another LS provider warrants good enough merit to be a widely used reference. I'm getting what you're laying down.
Some of those thoughts you put in to words in that post are one's I had but didn't care to put so eloquently.
SP's have to deal with a lot of b**ls**t, the likes of which someone who's not an SP can't at all fathom. I didn't want to get in to all the unimaginable gory details floating around in my mind and post them. I think an SP can easily pick up during a visit that I'm not a narcissistic sociopath or that I'm not some delusional psychopath. But to me, that's not good enough for a true reference of character when it comes to hobbying.
The only thing is, and this is just how I feel, that to not have an LS SP feel used just for the ask of the reference, I'd have to at least see them 3-6 times before I even broach that subject. Even then I would still feel wrong about asking them to do that. Also by that time, I feel that they would have a good enough grasp of how agreeable I am to having a fun and relaxing time, along with how easy going/chill I am to be around.
Maybe a lot of them connect with one another and it's all copacetic. It's like some kind of fraternity of information exchange and they may return the favour to one another. Either way we can prattle on about this for days. I see many of the sides and POV's. I have an understanding of the positives and negatives.
Samantha is the only independent provider that I'm interested in right now. Any other provider would be strictly used for the reference and dropped once it's given. That's not at all how I would like to play that out. So I'm stuck in Samantha no-man's land.
Agree to disagree. Disagree to Agree. It's all good.
|