View Single Post
  #2  
Old 02-18-2018, 07:49 AM
Gerald's Avatar
Gerald Gerald is offline
London Sugar Owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 6,158
Default Re: Are the parlors still the same after new bill pass?

The no touch law refers to strip clubs, not massage parlours.
Local sex workers and dancers are trying to eliminate the law because they say it puts women at risk.
It's another stupid law in a long line of stupid laws. If a woman says I can touch her tit, that's her choice.
Why is it, I can go to Victoria Park and have a topless woman sit on my lap, but if a fully clothed dancer does that in a club, she gets a heavy fine?
They are trying to legislate morality, or their interpretation of it.
London "moralists" hate strip clubs and massage parlours and will pull every trick in the book to squeeze them out of business.
Sexual assault is when you do something against another person's will. If two consenting adults are doing something that isn't a threat to themselves or others, then let them be.
London Ontario has no right having a law like this. It's like creating a law that states we have to wear formal clothing when entering McDonalds. It's not based on safety and violates basic human rights.
Keep in mind, this is the same city that got in deep shit for not allowiing a gay pride parade. We are also the first city in Canada to use the new C36 laws to charge an ****** agency, and so far that agency is winning the fight in the courts.

Not even the idiots in our city hall can stop touching in a massage parlour.

www.lfpress.com/2017/12/04/strip-clubs-sex-workers-slam-no-touch-bylaw
__________________
___________________________________________



Reply With Quote