Quote:
Originally Posted by Braveheart
Maybe instead of meaningless BS like "the coffee was served hot" and without badly insulting anyone we can use expressions like:
- looks better than her pics; looks like her pics; doesn't really resemble
her pics; pics are probably someone else...
- describes herself accurately; may not be describing herself accurately;
description is not accurate (elaborate a bit)...
- very pleasant company; pleasant company; not really pleasant company...
- very pretty; pretty; average looks; below average looks...
- nice facilities; adequate facilities; needs better facilities....
- impeccable hygiene; good hygiene; hygiene needs improvement...
- looks younger than her age; looks her age; may have subtracted more than
a few years from her age...
- may have subtracted more than 10 pounds......
- skills are outstanding; skills are good; skills are average; skills are below
expectations...
These are not my original ideas, of course, since I have seen many of these terms used in reviews and there are many more we can come up with.
As for being critical of those who don't post reviews - I will not generally post a review unless I can add something significant that other reviews of the SP have missed or maybe to add an opposing view. I would also generally be hesitant to post a really negative review unless the overall experience is really bad and the SP is clearly not fulfilling expectations. Maybe we all can work on being a little more honest regarding pointing out those things that fall short of expectations and this may also help SP's to improve. Everyone can benefit from constructive criticism. If ya have a crappy meal in a restaurant but you smile and tell the server it was great and then you never go back nobody wins. Anybody can have a bad day.
|
When doing a review you can use subjective criteria or you can use objective criteria.
When a reviewer says "looks better" or "is attractive" "skills are outstanding" they are using subjective criteria. There is no way to quantify "skills" or "looks" or attractiveness. All of it is in the eye of the beholder, and what one person considers mad skillz, another may think meh.
Whereas when a reveiwer states "she was 30 lbs heavier" or "ten years older" than her pics, he is using an objective criteria. Things like age and weight can be quantified and are not opinions.
Then the reader can make a decision on the review and take that into consideration when deciding whether or not to see that SP in question.