[Gerald]

I can appreciate you feeling disappointed if the lady didn't seem to measure up to what you expected. That's why I've always advised advertisers to be careful in using a professional photographer. The comment "she looks better in person", is what creates repeat clients.
Expectations set too high creates disappointment.

However, if someone goes to the trouble of writing a glowing review, I gotta believe he had a great time and that's all I need to know.
Maybe she had a zit on her nose and spinach in her teeth, but if he didn't care then why should I?
The reviewer owes us nothing and we should be grateful he said anything at all. It's not about the details it's about the over all experience.
As long as he's not a shill, he has to right to say (or not say) whatever he wants.
It's been a long standing issue on boards like this where members start demanding details they feel is owed to them. The reviewer paid good money to gain his knowledge, so either pay for yours or just take what is written on face value.
You have the right to post a bad review. You'd only get "attacked" if your review reads like an "attack".
You can say, "She seemed nice but didn't look like her pics and had bad hygiene so I didn't enjoy myself at all". That's respectful, honest and not something you'd be attacked for. Although, you have to allow others to comment giving their own experience even if it differs from yours.
If you write "She was fat and stunk", then you'd probably get attacked.
Remember, we don't know who you are. A lot of clients try to blackmail the ladies with "do it or I will write a bad review". A lot of other providers (and their boyfriends) will try and take out the competition. Then there are the really, really picky clients who are very difficult to satisfy.
Your time with a lady is not black and white, it's personal and different for everyone depending on what interests you and presses your good buttons.
Therefor we can only go on general consensus and take the gamble we will have the same experience.