Review of the reviewed....
 

So, I can't but help to notice that girls who are well reviewed perhaps don't look anything like there pictures at all or look just like there pictures plus 30lbs or plus 10 years or had one hell of a time with photoshop perhaps..... . ........ ......

So I have to wonder.... why are people not being honest in there reviews?? Personally I have avoided speaking my mind because im worried about backlash from people who are in love with certain SP's and putting out there positive reviews when they would have to be blind to not notice why things are off...

To date I have scene 2 local SP's who were polite, answered properly and clearly, looked like there pics, provided great coffee, didn't make me wait in a parking lot and again did I mention looked just like there pics???

One of them was Payton who is well reviewed and the other one is Cassandra who I have actually scene bad reviews of... like seriously? So for starters after today im seriously seeing no one but these 2 for a very very long time. And when I did see them I didn't post a review so hey guys, just so ya know both of these lovely ladies are legit, super nice and I had an amazing time with them!!

I like variety like many of us and for sometime I stuck to sp's with positive reviews thinking they could never steer me wrong.

Wrong!! Today was the third time I have been to an SP that had positive reviews here and on other sites that was completely not like the review. part of this is my fault. I'm terrified to leave when I'm not interested!!! 3 times now I have wasted my money on this because of what I saw on a review. The shittiest part of today was that I texted Cassandra but my stupid phone didn't send so I booked with someone else thinking she wasn't working.... Ironicly I pictured Cassandra in my head tying to keep things up with my eyes closed.... I donated money to do it too :( just to get to my car and see a reply from Cassandra. My stupid phone didn't send the msg to her until hours later :( d

Sorry if this is stupid but for the love of god some people need to take there goggles off and post an accurate review!! We art all looking for a relationship. Some of us just want the women to be legit, look like there pictures and have a good round of coffee....


Rant over.....

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

I don't understand why everyone else is supposed to be "honest", but you don't have to be because you are afraid of a little online backlash? Who are these bad experiences of yours then?

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

I'm curious also? Pm if you wish.

I do know of a few ladies that have older pictures and have should we say, added a few pounds. But then again,so have I. :grin:

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Saying nothing ito avoid drama is not the same as falsely promoting someone

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Again, we are supposed to "risk the drama" for you, but you are going to keep quiet? And yet, you post a "like seriously?" at someone else's bad review? So, you don't have a good time with someone, and it's the board's fault for not warning you, but when someone doesn't have a good time and you do, there is something wrong with that guy?

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

No Jeff, when someone says. "Looks just like her pics" or "pics are accurate" and she looks 10 years older and 30 pounds heavier.......when someone says she has E boobs and everyone agrees yet she has C's if she's lucky... when someone says all of this and she doesn't even look like her pics.... or she's so
Clean yet you get there and she smells with week long pubic hair "puke"

Girl may feel it today and not feel it tomorrow. Maybe you see her on a good day and you have a great time. Maybe I see her a week later and her cat just died and she gives me a terrible experience... that shit happens...

I'm just saying people say all these great things that are completely false, you can't control the environment everyday and the situations your exposed to but unless you get implants over night or eat an entire f'n buffet you will most likly look he same 😉

Maybe we could just focus a little more on accurate reveiws is all and appearance is a big part. If I want to have a connection with someone and great conversation I'll hit up Christian mingle 👌🏼 If I wanna coffee date I'll hit up back page and I would appreciate if my fellow hobbiest guided me to the best looking and smelling blend 😁

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

ok.. an honest review of your review of the reviewed.. if I counted correctly, 8 times you typed "there" instead of "their" :grin:

Perhaps ever since reviews have switched to talking about coffee preferences it's not said enough or has just become an unsaid given that YMMV. Everyone has different opinions and likes so your version of thin and athletic can vary to mine. Also, sometimes a picture can be taken to highlight a person's attributes and mask their own perceived faults. When one of us has a great time in the company of another here, we can see past any differences of our pre-existing visions we have compared to seeing in person.

Again.. not everyone would agree with your reviews or your version of "best looking and smelling" so how do you expect us to give a review that we'll think you will be absolutely thrilled in seeing the person for yourself? No one can predict that, nor should we even care to personally appease you. When we see someone, it is expected that we given the most honest and accurate review we can in our own eyes. Others can comment on agreeing, others may disagree. If the reviews peaks someone interest they can set up an appointment for themselves and hope they have just as great of a time if not better.

How's that working out for ya so far?? :rolleyes3: :coffee:

This is from a review you gave where you didn't agree with woman looking like her pictures yet you still had a great time with. As the saying goes, you can't judge a book by it's cover.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

I can appreciate you feeling disappointed if the lady didn't seem to measure up to what you expected. That's why I've always advised advertisers to be careful in using a professional photographer. The comment "she looks better in person", is what creates repeat clients.
Expectations set too high creates disappointment.

However, if someone goes to the trouble of writing a glowing review, I gotta believe he had a great time and that's all I need to know.
Maybe she had a zit on her nose and spinach in her teeth, but if he didn't care then why should I?
The reviewer owes us nothing and we should be grateful he said anything at all. It's not about the details it's about the over all experience.
As long as he's not a shill, he has to right to say (or not say) whatever he wants.
It's been a long standing issue on boards like this where members start demanding details they feel is owed to them. The reviewer paid good money to gain his knowledge, so either pay for yours or just take what is written on face value.
You have the right to post a bad review. You'd only get "attacked" if your review reads like an "attack".
You can say, "She seemed nice but didn't look like her pics and had bad hygiene so I didn't enjoy myself at all". That's respectful, honest and not something you'd be attacked for. Although, you have to allow others to comment giving their own experience even if it differs from yours.
If you write "She was fat and stunk", then you'd probably get attacked.
Remember, we don't know who you are. A lot of clients try to blackmail the ladies with "do it or I will write a bad review". A lot of other providers (and their boyfriends) will try and take out the competition. Then there are the really, really picky clients who are very difficult to satisfy.
Your time with a lady is not black and white, it's personal and different for everyone depending on what interests you and presses your good buttons.
Therefor we can only go on general consensus and take the gamble we will have the same experience.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Hey 750...

Don't be a coward. You really should reply to the comments.

The fine ladies on this board know better to engage with you.

G runs a great board here and has integrity.

That is what separates this board from others.

Sorry about your experiences, might not be with the fine ladies here.
Or YMMV, life is a two way street.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Desperate Girls pull Desperate Measures

Ummmmmm you said no one wants a relationship!?! IMO 98% of Providers are not looking for a bf or relationship but there is always that one girl looking to Date you, Drain you then Ditch you!!! Then she'll throw you on the dangerous species list and say we should avoid you!!!

I've always wondered if guys walk away more then they stay but without her having walk outs I can see why she stays in business...:rolleyes:

Never met Cassandra before but I've met Payton and agree with the OP it's her in her pictures...and love the new sleeve!!!

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

To some degree I understand what the OP is saying. There are times when descriptions are less than objective-instead of stating that an SP "has small breasts and that's what I like" the reviewer may state that the SP has incredible breasts. Could be somewhat misleading to someone who likes large breasts. everybody has preferences and one person's 10 may be someone else's 5. I think there are times when the reviews are incredibly misleading, and while I agree with Gerald that clients try to leverage the prospect of a good review, there are also ladies from this board and other places who try to leverage service for good reviews.
We haven't had a meet and greet in a few years, and they were useful for networking because then you could see what many of the ladies look like in person without an initial commitment.
Unfortunately you expressed what seem like honest opinions and got criticized by some, called a coward, and as often happens, you probably feel that your comments were not welcomed, while at the same time being told you should have posted your honest opinions and reviews in the past. The "welcome to London Sugar and please participate and don't be afraid to post your opinions but make sure you don't say anything we don't like" is one of the charming things about this board.

Tipper

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Thanks Tipper, I didn't want to get flamed on here but I was frustrated. I agree we all have our own perspective of what we like. I reammber Viper use to start of every storey to me with "you wouldn't like her but"when we all use to meet up for beers. But I'm straight up referring to people false advertising cup size ect.

I didn't mean to start an uproar (directed at everyone bitchkng me out) I just work hard for my money and really bare throwing it down the drain. A little more accuracy would be great

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Thanks for writing your post 750gxsr. I have wanted to write something similar but was to shy to. I try to read reviews to get some perspective on what I could expect when I visit with someone. I really dislike when ages or weights are not accurately listed. I have been to embarrassed to write that a companion did not look as good as the photos, or who's weight did not match what was posted as that just feels rude to me. I just don't make second visits. But maybe if these items were honestly posted or reviewed if not accurate, the reviews would be more valid.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

We live in a time and place of such abundance that it is too easy to put on unwanted weight. When was the last you felt hungry?

In my mind there is no such thing as a BBW ..Big Beautiful Woman..and many SPs post photos of their younger, slimmer selves as that is how they WANT to look, knowing that their potential clients usually prefer shapely slender women (like they used to be). Older, fuller figured photos will not attract clients, and the inaccurate photos will bring in clients who will not turn around and walk away.

Inspite of all the politically correct Fat Shamming BS there is nothig healthy or attractive about fat people.

And yeah....I am 10 lbs over my ideal weight so call me an old guy with a small pot calling the kettle black.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Maybe instead of meaningless BS like "the coffee was served hot" and without badly insulting anyone we can use expressions like:
- looks better than her pics; looks like her pics; doesn't really resemble
her pics; pics are probably someone else...
- describes herself accurately; may not be describing herself accurately;
description is not accurate (elaborate a bit)...
- very pleasant company; pleasant company; not really pleasant company...
- very pretty; pretty; average looks; below average looks...
- nice facilities; adequate facilities; needs better facilities....
- impeccable hygiene; good hygiene; hygiene needs improvement...
- looks younger than her age; looks her age; may have subtracted more than
a few years from her age...
- may have subtracted more than 10 pounds......
- skills are outstanding; skills are good; skills are average; skills are below
expectations...
These are not my original ideas, of course, since I have seen many of these terms used in reviews and there are many more we can come up with.
As for being critical of those who don't post reviews - I will not generally post a review unless I can add something significant that other reviews of the SP have missed or maybe to add an opposing view. I would also generally be hesitant to post a really negative review unless the overall experience is really bad and the SP is clearly not fulfilling expectations. Maybe we all can work on being a little more honest regarding pointing out those things that fall short of expectations and this may also help SP's to improve. Everyone can benefit from constructive criticism. If ya have a crappy meal in a restaurant but you smile and tell the server it was great and then you never go back nobody wins. Anybody can have a bad day.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Agree :thumbup:

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Excellent. I agree too!

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

well said

I saw a SP a few months back that I saw 3yrs ago. She was still using the same pics as then... pics need updating as she gained 25-30lbs. But we still had fun. Plus I don't look like I did 3yrs ago either :mad: damn age thing catching up on me

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Well, I'm gonna wade into the topic. First, you'd expect advertisors to put their "best" pics up as it's intended to attract clients. Second, I have some current pics of me that are not that flattering and others where the light is just right, might even look downright handsome. So, you do have to look at some of the pics to see how the angle is taken and if it's strategically positioned to accent something or to hide something else.

There are indeed a few that have some dated pics, they are indeed the person being advertised but, have changed physically. But, in some of those cases, I would argue they are likely posted to let their regulars know they are available.

Lastly, I've found as age and experience is accumulated, what we view with our eyes as attractive, doesn't always translate to the best encounter.

I prefer petite athletic women that are gymnasts in the bed room. And some I've contact look exactly like the pics, if not better but, have the personality of a dead fish. I've also spent time with some others that may not posses the physical attributes I prefer but, more than make up for it in their sexuality and enthusiasm. Not that their pics were inaccurate but, they may have had a little extra weight or a few years older than stated.

This board does have some lovely ladies. More than a couple. Dylan and Anika are two off the top that have updated pics and consistently have positive feedback. And they also have positive attitudes.

Is it fair to expect all to have the same business model? We can expect it but, it's not likely.

There is only 1 that I can think of that has pics that are outdated and was a little more to her than expected. It was in my earlier days. And truth be told, she was a great time. I just found it somewhat misleading and put me off but, since then, I've found plenty of excellent providers the meet my needs in appearance and encounters.


It's a great topic and read some good and bad feedback.

Happy Hobbying.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Glad to see you giving props to Dylan and Anika ...bang on comments!
They both have excellent attitudes !!
Timely that you posted your comment on Dylan's birthday too ! :cool:
I would also add Sadie to this category !

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

When doing a review you can use subjective criteria or you can use objective criteria.

When a reviewer says "looks better" or "is attractive" "skills are outstanding" they are using subjective criteria. There is no way to quantify "skills" or "looks" or attractiveness. All of it is in the eye of the beholder, and what one person considers mad skillz, another may think meh.

Whereas when a reveiwer states "she was 30 lbs heavier" or "ten years older" than her pics, he is using an objective criteria. Things like age and weight can be quantified and are not opinions.

Then the reader can make a decision on the review and take that into consideration when deciding whether or not to see that SP in question.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

Tipper just nailed it. Don't sweat the taunts, OP. This board has always had its white knights, and Gerald has too often allowed those defenders to get away with rude conduct in their rebuking of a critical SP review. It is what it is. It's Gerald's forum. He doesn't really have to answer for anything he doesn't want to, I guess. But the forum could be so much more if didn't play favourites with certain rude posters. For the record, you're right about posters making inaccurate reviews. I don't know if they do it consciously (maybe they're in love) or if a not-entirely-honest review is made to curry favour with a favourite girl. Whatever the reason, those types of reviews do make this board a less effective medium for info. I usually take certain posters' comments with a grain of salt.

Sorry to hear you got screwed over.

It happens, though.

Re: Review of the reviewed....
 

IMO, the OP is makes a complaint and in the same breath, not giving specifics of whom the poor experience is with. State who the Coffee providers are and why you were disappointed. You don't have to drag their name through the mud but, you can mention who they are, if the pics are old, or the person is 10 plus years older than the pics suggest and or, the SP is heavier than what they state.

It's fair feedback without being insulting.

As for the ladies of this board, I would say from the vast majority, they represent themselves very well. No white knight, no flower rimmed glasses.

Anika, Dylan, Natalia, Payton have all been better than advertised. Pics and coffee.

I have mentioned a couple of BP exploits that didn't go well, and had another member chime in and express a completely different experience.

Was my experience accurate? Was I trying to warn fellow coffee connoisseurs? Or was I just jilted and wanting to negatively affect the coffee provider's business? I believe it was accurate and I'm sure the other member was accurate as well. Two different people. Completely different opinions.

For me, this board does provide a joint community service to both coffee houses and those that enjoy coffee. Not everyone likes Timmies, some even hate it. Others are McDs while others go to Starbucks or Second cup etc.

They hang a shingle, serve their best brew. Some feedback is valuable. Others is not.

I find the quality of information here much better than other places were you have no idea if things are fact or fiction.